- Home
- Repair or replace
Repair it, or replace it?
The question every owner and every householder asks, worked through as a decision tree rather than answered by whoever is standing in your plant room. Four questions, five places it can come out, and two of them say keep repairing.
Answer in order
Nothing is sent anywhere. There is no email field on this page and there is not going to be one.
Where this comes out
Answer the questions on the left and the route through the diagram lights up. The outcome is written out here.
A system that is not running at all is not a repair-or-replace question yet — it is a diagnosis question. Until somebody knows why it stopped, any figure you are given for replacing it is a figure produced without information.
- In a building, ask what has failed before you ask what it costs.
- In a house, check the breaker and the filter first. It is free and it is often the answer.
- A quotation to replace, offered before the fault is found, is a sales call.
Repeated failures inside two years are rarely bad luck and they are almost never fixed by a new machine. Something upstream is doing the damage — airflow, electrical supply, drainage, controls fighting each other, or a component that was the wrong specification when it went in.
- Replacing the unit without finding the cause reproduces the fault on newer equipment.
- Ask for the previous failures in writing. The pattern is usually visible in them.
- This is the outcome where we most often tell people not to spend the big money yet.
Running, not failing repeatedly, and under fifteen years old. On that evidence it is a repair. Equipment of that age generally still has parts, still has value, and is not the place the next budget cycle should be spent.
- Keep it on a schedule; most of what shortens plant life is skipped maintenance.
- Record the numbers each visit so a real trend exists when the question comes round again.
- Spend the money on ducts, controls and airflow, which usually return more than new plant would.
Past fifteen, and supply is getting difficult. The risk here is not the cost of the repair, it is the wait: an obsolete part on back-order in July is a building without cooling for however long the lead time turns out to be.
- Budget for it now, so the decision is not made under pressure on the day it dies.
- Get the survey done while it is still running — access, curb and electrical supply are much easier to establish on a working unit.
- Where the building cannot tolerate an outage at all, bring the replacement forward rather than gambling.
Past fifteen, but still supportable and not failing repeatedly. This is the comfortable case, and it is the one where planning is worth most: you have time to phase it across budget years, to do it in your own hours, and to get competing prices properly.
- Survey now, replace on your schedule rather than on the weather’s.
- A phased renewal across two or three years usually beats one emergency.
- Use the time to fix the ductwork, which is far cheaper while the plant is off anyway.
This tree is a way of organising a decision, not an inspection. It knows nothing about your building, your refrigerant, your load or your budget, and it deliberately produces no price. A survey does those things; this does not pretend to.
What the questions are actually testing
-
01
Is it running at all?
Separates a decision from an emergency. People arrive at the repair-or-replace question while standing in a cold building, and that is the worst possible moment to make it. If it has stopped, the first job is to find out why — not to choose between two numbers.
-
02
Has it failed more than once in two years?
Tests whether the machine is the problem. Repeated failures point upstream almost every time, and a new unit installed on top of an unresolved cause fails the same way with a warranty attached to it.
-
03
Is it more than fifteen years old?
A rough marker, not a rule. Fifteen is roughly where packaged rooftop equipment in this climate starts to come apart in more than one place at a time. Well-maintained plant outlasts it comfortably; neglected plant does not get near it.
-
04
Are parts or refrigerant hard to source?
The question that most often decides it in practice. Availability, not efficiency, is what turns a repairable unit into a liability — because the cost that hurts is the fortnight the building spends waiting for a part.
What this tree deliberately leaves out
Efficiency ratings, payback periods and tax credits all belong in the conversation, and none of them belong in a four-question diagram. They depend on your tariff, your hours, your envelope and on rules that change; anyone who reduces them to a chart on a website is selling something. We put real numbers to them at survey, for your building, and we show the workings.